UAPA Case Over Alleged Maoist Links : Supreme Court Issues Notice On NIA’s Challenge To Bail Granted To Kerala Youth Allan Shuhaib

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notice within the extraordinary take off appeal recorded by the National Investigation Agency challenging the Kerala High Court judgment which did not meddled with the trial court’s order giving bail to law understudy Allan Shuhaib in a UAPA case enlisted over alleged Maoist links.

 A bench comprising Judges UU Lalit and Ajay Rastogi tagged the appeal in conjunction with the appeal recorded by Allan Shuhaib’s co-accused Thwaha Fasal, a journalism understudy, challenging the very same judgment of the Kerala High Court which set aside the bail allowed to him by the Extraordinary NIA Court.

The bench posted both the petitions for last hearing within the third week of September Senior Advocate R Basant showed up for Thwaha Fasal and Additional Solicitor General SV Raju showed up for the NIA.

 The NIA recorded the SLP against the bail allowed to Shuhaib after Fasal drawn closer the Supreme Court looking for bail. The Supreme Court had earlier watched that it’ll listen both the petitions together as they emerge from the same judgment.

The petitions are recorded against the judgment passed by the Kerala High Court on January 4 this year which toppled the discoveries of the Special NIA Court that no prima facie case is made out against the accused from the chargesheet. Whereas the High Court set aside the bail allowed to Fasal and inquired him to surrender, it did not disturbed the bail allowed to Allan Shuhaib considering his youthful age additionally his psychiatric issues related to depression.

 The Special Court, in its order conveyed in September final year, had watched that no prima facie case was made out against the charged so as to draw in Area 43D(5) of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

The Special Court watched that the case materials, at the foremost, recommended that the accused had Maoist leanings but said that they had not reveled in any unmistakable viciousness or incitement to viciousness. The High Court watched that the trial court went into a “thread-bare investigation of the archives on record as in the event that in a trial and watched that the archives seized from the accused were “profoundly inflammable and volatile”.

 In April, the Supreme Court had issued notice in Fasal’s appeal orally watching that the “trial court has moreover passed an equally well contemplated order”.

 The case was first enrolled by the Kerala Police in November 2019, which captured Allan Shuhaib and Fasal affirming that they had links with Maoist organizations. Afterward, the NIA took over the case.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close